Subscribe to my monthly newsletter and get the following ebooks free: Things Slip Through,
Hiram Grange & The Chosen One, and Devourer of Souls
Showing posts with label ebooks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ebooks. Show all posts

Monday, April 4, 2011

Clarification Of My Ebook, Self-Publishing Wave of the Digital Future Views

So, the digital future of ebooks.

Self-publishing.

The death of print and book stores and all.

So, where do I stand?

I've made no secret about my aversion to ebooks as a reader and buyer.  On one hand, Kindles and Nooks are a bit too expensive for a guy on a Catholic School salary anyway, and I simply have no desire to read a story on my laptop.  Hurts my eyes.  Ironically enough, if one of my favorite authors in the world came out with a story that was only ever going to be in ebook and I was desperate enough, I'd probably just print the sucker out.

Recently, a friend pointed me towards a free download of H. P. Lovecraft's work.  I responded in truthfulness, I'd rather pay for a print copy.  That's just how I am.   I hit my local used bookstore twice a week.   

I love my books.

Understand, my aversion to the digital revolution is an emotional one, not based in reality or common sense whatsoever.    I literally get depressed when I hear about book stores dying and how print's going away.  In my head, rationally, I know the importance of a writer exploring the future.  Recently, at the Horror-Drive In, Brian Keene was gracious enough to offer his insights about newbie writers getting on the digital train, and he pointed the way towards affordable, reasonable, and efficient ways to self-publish digitally.

So I get it.  Publish or perish, as they say in academic circles.  But I have such a hard time working my head around it.  To me, ebooks are not books.  They are electrons.  That's all they ever will be.

Am I being needlessly stubborn and nostalgic and backward?

You bet I am.

But I'm not against digital self-publishing.   It might be cool - if there's ever a demand - to self-publish a small digital collection of some of my shorts.  But right now, I've really got no audience, no one to sell to.   Maybe I don't understand the digital market very well, but therein lies my recent vexation with the whole thing:

Seems like there's several authors who are consistently beating the "self-publishing digitally" drum.  Over.  And over.  To the point of it being ridiculous.  And yes, we've all heard about the guy who walked away from half a mil from a traditional house to self-publish (Personally, all I can think when I think of THAT is our obsolete and leaking septic tank, crumbling foundation, fifty-years out of date wiring, and all my college loans).  And I don't disbelieve those folks.  I'm sure they CAN make money self-publishing.  I'm don't think they're lying, at all. 

But they seem to want all the rest of us to do it, too.  And if we don't, we're not being smart new writers.  That, and even though they all claim to love books just as much as the next guy, they seem to be rubbing their hands with an inordinate amount of glee over the death of book stores and traditional print in general.   "The lady doth protest too much", really.

A fact:  publishing is changing.  Can't get around that.   BUT...

A fact: no one can predict what's going to happen.  Who knows what the landscape will look like in ten years.

A fact: there are still thousands of authors apparently publishing with NY and doing just fine.  Unless they're all lying to us.  So there must still be good traditional publishers and editors out there.

A fact: I have no audience.

A fact: If I self-publish digitally tomorrow, I might make some pocket change.  But not nearly as much as our current self-publishing champions.  And not nearly enough to make abandoning traditional print worthwhile.

A FACT: I'm not against self-publishing digitally, even for myself.  I'm just tired of a select few whose circumstances are radically different from the "newbie author with no audience" telling us all we'll get rich self-publishing and make more than we'll ever make with traditional publishers and that we're stupid if we don't self publish right now.

Way I see it, unless you've established yourself, something "happens" to your career: a great blurb, an award, a Stoker (even though people like to trash it), or through years of writing and word of mouth, making any kind of money writing is fast becoming a much harder thing.  You can still do it.  But it's much harder these days.

Maybe that's a good thing.  I always thought I wanted to write for a living.  But now I'm not so sure.  I'll still want to write WELL, to write stories that stand and that people will love to read.   But hey: I know now I'll probably never be able to write fast enough and finish enough things to write for a living (Luckily, I'm a teacher, and for the most part, I still really like my job, so I don't feel the pressure TO write for a living).  And, I probably won't jump onto the digital wagon quick enough to make a good career at it.

But maybe that's best.  

Because then I'll just write things I love, and write simply because I NEED to (Which DOES NOT imply that people who right for a career or who digitally self-publish are heartless mercenaries who don't love to write.  Just so we're clear).


PS:  This week begins "Autism Awareness Month".  As you can see, our house is lit in blue as part of recognizing this.  Expect a post concerning this later in the week....

Tuesday, December 28, 2010

Skeptical of Self Publishing and E-Publishing: Why I'm Not Convinced

This is going to be one of those rare opinionated posts.  I don't write many.  Mostly because I'm not a person of strong opinions.  Notice, I didn't say a person not of strong convictions.  I just don't hold strong opinions I feel important enough to share with others.  Also, I know very well who I am.  A guy who's had a few short stories and a novella published in the small press.  That's it.  There's no reason for anyone to listen to what  I have to say or accept my voice as any kind of authority.

However, this blog has increasingly become a vehicle of self-expression and a pressure relief valve.  When something is boiling inside and needs release; when I see something or remember something and it makes me think about or feel something, I blog about it.  So, this post comes more from a need for release, rather than my desire to convince people to support my position. 

That having been said, read this L. A. Times Article.

Now, I'll be the first to admit I've got a blind spot in general when it comes to e-publishing.  While I'm fan of my work being available in MULTIPLE formats, I'm not a fan of the ebook itself.  I don't plan on ever buying one, or a reader device.  This is not a logical objection; I'm aware of that. 

But as far as I'm concerned, an ebook is not a book.  It's a bundle of electrons. That's all.  Let's not get into it, because you're not gonna convince me otherwise, and I'm well aware I'm not being practical but stubborn.  We'll just let this particular dog lie, and you can shake your head and think me eccentric, and I'll be just fine with that.

Here's the thing that's been digging under my craw lately. For the last year or so, seems like lots of people are making big deals about abandoning traditional publishing - New York in particular - and striking out alone on the self-publishing path, particularly in ebook format.  

And granted, there have been plenty of BIG names doing it, enough to start changing the stigma that comes with self-publishing.  It's become much easier to produce nice graphic arts for a cover, and formatting programs for a book's interior design have become much more user friendly.  In fact, in light of the recent Leisure Fiction Crash and Burn, I'm totally in support of writers like Brian Keene  - who have been screwed - getting the rights to their work back and self-publishing their backlist, even experimenting with a few self-published titles.

The thing that's kinda rubbed me the wrong way, though, is the pronouncement from - again - scores of big names that traditional publishing is dead or on the way out, that they've been screwed by New York, and their assertion that self-publishing is the wave of the future, that it gives writers more options and a greater share of the royalties.    And here's the thing: for them, that may very well be true, but it seems to me as if they're leaving something pretty huge out of the equation.

They're names.  Proven writers.  With fan bases built up through several dozen novels.  Of course self-publishing is a better option for them, because their fans are going to leap to and buy their work and spread the word.  I'm sure they'll get new readers - and, I should point out I've done no research, so maybe I'm completely wrong about this - but my gut tells me there's a big difference between some of these writers announcing to their readerships and the media and their colleagues that they're going to self-publish, and ME or some of my colleagues announcing we're going to self-publishing something. 

If "Insert Name Here" author, former New York Times Bestseller, previously published through a New York House announces their new self-published novel, people will care and buy.

Pardon the strong language, but if I announce MY new self-published novel: who the hell cares?

But it's not like I want people to care.  People shouldn't care.  I haven't proven myself yet.  I've written a few okay things, but I have no reader base because I haven't done anything yet worthy of a reader base.  And I guess here's what I'm getting at:  I don't care that some big names, experienced and skilled writers are pioneering on the self-publishing trail.  More power to them.  As long as their work is affordable - and in print - I'll probably support them with my patronage.

But I'm tired of this repeated drum beating about the future of publishing, by folks who can afford to take these kind of risks.  There should be a note of caution: just because the big boys (and gals, sorry women writers for the gender stereotyping) are quitting traditional publishing, doesn't mean everyone should.  So what if I can release a collection of my short stories on Smashwords? Maybe I'll make a buck or two.

But that doesn't mean I'll have produced anything of worth.  More like I sold some junk at a garage sale, and that's all.  Which is not to say that I need a lot of money to prove I'm a writer.  But this idea that we no longer need publishers and editors as gatekeepers? 

I'm not convinced.  Maybe the big writers who are proven hits don't feel like they need an editor, but I sure as hell do, and not just a PROOF-READER or beta reader to grammar check.  I mean an  editor who knows the market, who challenges story ideas and pushes writers (who are obviously too close to their own work) to new territory.   I sure as hell know I need one of those.

In the next week or so, I'll be sending off my very first New York House pitch.  I feel  really good about the story and it's first three chapters.  So good that if this house passes, I'm totally okay with that.  Why do I have this confidence in my story?

Because in my phone conversation with the senior acquisitions editor, my original story - which sucked, by the way - was challenged.  Torn up a little. Poked and prodded.  Its deficiencies and short comings pointed out. And now, because of the rewriting this caused: it's a damn fine story, all because this editor did THEIR JOB.

As a gatekeeper.

Which....sorry...

I for one am not ready to do without.