Nearing the end of this paper, so hopefully tomorrow will see an original blog. Here again, however, for your interest or for simply kicks, part of my closing statements in my paper for Film & Philosophy: (WARNING! NOT EDITED!)
In Isabel Pinedo’s assessment, horror is an
“exercise in recreational terror”, a simulation of danger not
unlike a roller coaster ride – something that provides thrills and
chills, but is essentially “safe” (25). Horror also
denaturalizes the “repressed” (fears, worries, anxieties), by
transmuting the “natural” elements of everyday life into the
unnatural form of the “monster” (26).
In other words, the things
we fear in life - loss, loneliness, failure, death, betrayal, loss of
self, marginalization, age – are often (but not always) transformed
into monsters in the horror film, making them more emotionally
accessible. And, up for potential “defeat”. So by
“monstrifying” these fears, horror films unearth our repressed
fears and worries to be dealt with in a unconscious manner we may
merely recognize as “narrative pleasure”, IE. we “enjoy the
story”.
Pinedo relates this to Freud’s dream
theories, that as dreams displace and condense repressed thoughts and
feelings, so horror films introduce monstrous elements to “disfigure”
or diminish our own horrors. As dreams are unconscious attempts to
express conflicts and resolve tensions, so horror films allow
audiences to express and master feelings too threatening to
articulate or face consciously.
So because of this, Pinedo believes
that all horror films must strike a tenuous balance: they must
produce a fear-experience that will not generate too much distress to
make us walk out of the theater, but be thrilling enough for us to engage in this
“fear-experience” (26). This, of course, varies depending on the
film and director, as well as on individual film viewer’s varying
constitutions and tastes.
Though not a movie but a television
series, Buffy the Vampire Slayer serves as an excellent example of
this method of “monstrifying fears”, especially in regards to
teenage fears. First, and most basic: Sunnydale High School sits over
a “Hellmouth”, which is a portal to hell, presenting an excellent
image of what many students must think: ‘school is hell.’
Other
struggles are “monstrified”: a possessive boyfriend literally
transforms into an abusive “monster” after taking a home-made
serum that amplifies his abilities, an overbearing mother desperate to
relive her high school glory days uses magic to switch places with
her daughter. Xander, one of Buffy’s friends, “falls in” with
the “wrong crowd” and begins acting (and turning into) a hyena,
preying upon the weak.
A boy beaten into a coma by his little
league coach for missing a fly ball projects his astral self and
fractures the time-space-continuum, bringing everyone’s nightmares
– Buffy’s casual dismissal by her estranged father, Giles’
failure as a Watcher, resulting in Buffy’s death and resurrection
as a vampire - to horrifying life. A homicidal cyborg tricks Buffy’s
friends and even mother into accepting him into their lives, playing
the role of a caring, loving man who just wants to make Buffy's single mother happy - who then begins to mistreat
Buffy behind the scenes.
And finally, when Buffy and Angel
consummate their love, he “transforms” into a monster, losing his
soul, their very consummation destroying the love they once had,
which most high school partners never consider, that sex is a huge,
cataclysmic event that alters us all: on a deep, fundamental level of
the soul. Whatever else can be said about Buffy as a vehicle for
post-modern horror or just as a television show in general, one thing
it succeeded at was “monstrifying” the fears and struggles of
teenagers into literal monsters within the show’s narrative.
Noel Carroll agrees with this proposed
relationship between horror films and audiences, and offers a more
nuanced expansion of Pinedo’s idea of “narrative pleasure” with
his theory of General and Universal Theories of Horrific Appeal.
According to Carroll, because many horror films are narrative-based
stories bent on discovering unknown or unknowable things, he
theorized that even as audiences are necessarily disquieted or
distressed or even disgusted and repulsed by the revelation of these
things, they are drawn to how these things unfold within the
structure of the narrative.
Their desire to know draws them into
these stories; they simply want to discover, to know, to see how it
all ends. They are fascinated with the process of the investigation,
exploration, discovery, and then - if possible – the overcoming of
unknowable, impossible things (189 – 191), even if, in the
postmodern sense, most of these monsters can’t be overcome.
Audiences still want to see people try.
These are very broad ways that horror
in general can provide “effective meditation on issues which affect
society.”
And here's hoping I'll be done soon....
** quotations taken from Isabel Pinedo's essay "Recreational Terror: Postmodern Elements of the Contemporary Film" and Noel Carroll's The Philosophy of Horror.
This sounds like a great paper! I would choice to read it in full
ReplyDeleteWell, when it's edited, I'll be uploading iy to Issuu, and then everyone can have a go at it....
ReplyDelete